Mike, Just for fun, let's go to the body check - technically the 0000xx numbers were used again in '73. So let's remove any doubt (not that there is much). :)
Does yours have a batwing pickguard? (they were discontinued in '72)
Does the neck join meet at 17th or 19th fret. 19th fret ended in '71.
These two things alone should reinforce your serial and pot codes. :)
Does it look like this?Now - if we go with my 1972 SG standard, this was re-introduced late in the year, the serial number is in the '72 range and the pots say '72 but the kicker is the embossed Gibson pickups. They were only for '72. That's it. Also it has the small rectangle inlays from that year. And the other oddity is that the embossed are tarbacks, which is even rarer as tarbacks showed up that year. So while the '72 standard was introduced late in '72 I am betting this was a very late, end of year one. Oh and it has the optional Gibson bigsby, which was extra money that year. So late '72.
Does it look like this?
(Image courtesy of eBay..)
Gibson marked pickups..(Which I've seen on MANY SG Deluxes
)
A true '72 SG Standard.The missing link between the SG Deluxe and the '73 "redesigned" Standard style..it has a mix of features, but mainly SG Deluxe appointments, as in the raised Les Paul style pickguard, lack of bevels in the cutaways, same "90 degree angle" neck joint but conventionally routed in the rear for the electronics..
These are very rare to come across..I've only seen 3 or 4 in my life! And I've done a LOT of research...
Would you mind sharing pics and the pot codes? I'd love to add this to my timeline of early '70's SGs.![]()
Kris, chances are it is his avatar guitar.
![]()
I see the harmonica bridge on that one.
So Kris does your 72 have the Tar-Backs or the Patent Sticker pups? Wouldn't it be something to correlate the Tar-Backs arrival with the wider Schaller bridge.?! I have seen guitars dated after 72 with the smaller Nashville bridges too I mean leave it to Gibson to go back n forth as they find parts or whatever. And there is always the wrong dating possibilty we've been talking about everytime an owner throws a date out there because of these damn serial numbers. The Book! We need that Book Kris!
Hey, have you guys ever tried pricing original Gibson Embossed pup covers from this Era? Or even steeper, Embossed Patent Sticker pups?!? Yowsers! But then again every once in a while you see tar-back pups go for some coin too. I don't even want to look on ebay right now because I damn well know what happens when I do!!!Oh yeah, I get it bad! Real bad!
You rang? LOLAnyway, thats all I got on this era SG without going crazy looking things up further. I don't think they were making any mini humbucker models but the Juniors & the Specials of this era came with soapbar P-90's mounted in a batwing pickgard and I am led to believe that even these were routed the same as all the SG bodies ran through the same process of routing ending with them all looking like your pickup cavity route. Look at it from Gibson's perspective. This really simplified routing the bodies for them.
Here's a 69 Junior. Still got the batwing with 3 less holes. No toggle & missing 1 vol & tone. Is the pup route the same? I think so but I have never opened one personally.
![]()
If anyone knows different we will be sure to see it. Safe enough to say, relax, that route job was 'standard' for the time period.
You rang? LOLI had an EARLY '69 (all '68 specs) SG Junior..
Yes, '68 specs..check out those deeper cutaway bevels..It had a '69 SN#(535199)
But all '68 features..check out the neck joint...
The bitch about this one is that the pot codes were useless..one was a '66, and the other was from the '80's..
It was definitely only routed for one P-90..![]()
Well that certainly puts an end to the possibility of all SG's between 67-70 with Large pickguards being routed all the same with 3 pup routes. Yet being it was a 1 pup route it still lets me wonder about a 2 pup version havine that 3 pup route. Although at this point I'm doubting that possibility. But none the less they needlessly routed all the SG Standards for three pups so who T-F knows! Any ideas why? Was this a time saver??? Inventory simplifier? I can see the one size fits all mentality being hard to resist. But this SG clearly proves this wasn't the case! Thanks Kris! One more SG question settled.![]()