Has anyone run 250K pots in an SG?

  • Thread starter flyswatter
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

flyswatter

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
312
Reaction score
210
Location
Montreal
Hi,

Love my SG Special Faded but I find it quite a lot brighter tonally than my LP Custom copy and even my Tele when (as usual) I play it on the neck pickup.

I play in a blues rock band and I'm really into that "dark" Paul Kossoff type of Gibson tone, which my LP does very well; however, I'd much rather be playing my SG for the playability and overall feel.

I thought that replacing the 500K CTS pots currently in the guitar with 250Ks (more normally used with Fender single coils) might be a way to darken the tone of the guitar a little. Of course, I can roll off the treble on the tone control, but I'd prefer a more permanent fix.

So, to anyone who has run 250ks in an SG. How did you like them? Did they have any significant effect on tone?

Thanks in advance.
 

flyswatter

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
312
Reaction score
210
Location
Montreal
Tweaking the tone control on the amp does not have the same effect as the guitar itself producing a darker tone. Also, I'm a gigging guitar player who switches from Gibby's to Fenders during shows, and I'd much rather be able to plug and go, without tweaking amp settings.
 

gball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
1,865
Reaction score
1,889
Location
The beach.
Of course, I can roll off the treble on the tone control, but I'd prefer a more permanent fix.
.

Seems to me the tone knob is a pretty permanent thing. Why not just roll back? A 500k pot rolled back half way is, more or less, the equivalent of a 250k pot. That is of course why they are adjustable.

Or am I missing something?

When questions like this come up for me I think of this:
http://youtu.be/ZkGCvLstPrE
 

javamagic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
3,511
Reaction score
1,269
Location
Ennis, Clare, Ireland
Back in the '50s LP Juniors were fitted with a 500k volume pot and a 250k tone pot. Of course that is for P-90s but I do wonder why Gibson switched to using 500k pots for both functions on P-90 equipped guitars in the 1960s? Possibly just to standardise and save the bother of buying two values of pot? :dunno:
 

eS.G.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
15,305
Reaction score
10,424
Location
The SWAMP (central Florida)
Seems to me the tone knob is a pretty permanent thing. Why not just roll back? A 500k pot rolled back half way is, more or less, the equivalent of a 250k pot. That is of course why they are adjustable.

Or am I missing something?

When questions like this come up for me I think of this:
Joe Bonamassa's Gibson Les Paul tone tips guitar lesson - YouTube

Great video thanks for posting, very good base lesson in how to work the knobs for your tone.:applause::dude:
 

flyswatter

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
312
Reaction score
210
Location
Montreal
Thanks folks. I poked around the guitar a bit last night and I think I'm going to just stick with the 500Ks and work the tones as donepearce originally suggested.
 

potatofarmer

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
84
Reaction score
49
Seems to me the tone knob is a pretty permanent thing. Why not just roll back? A 500k pot rolled back half way is, more or less, the equivalent of a 250k pot. That is of course why they are adjustable.

Or am I missing something?

Yeah, the math behind pickups is kind of a mess.

Check out this spreadsheet, it makes things a lot easier to see: www.harryj.net/voltone.xls
 

oldleftySG

Active Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
240
Reaction score
168
Location
Oswego NY
A 500k pot rolled back half way is, more or less, the equivalent of a 250k pot. Or am I missing something?

That's what was suggested here when I was building my Jr. But when I asked about that on TGP the wizards said "Not so fast whippersnapper..."

Apparently the capacitor has something to say about it?
 

gball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
1,865
Reaction score
1,889
Location
The beach.
That's what was suggested here when I was building my Jr. But when I asked about that on TGP the wizards said "Not so fast whippersnapper..."

Apparently the capacitor has something to say about it?

Sure, no doubt it has an effect. Just saying that with an audio-taper 500k pot, there is some setting in there when you roll it back that is aurally analogous to a 250k pot, at least to my ears.
 

Col Mustard

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Messages
8,857
Reaction score
9,382
Location
Oscoda Michigan
there's one more suggestion that hasn't been made: The EQ pedal...

I find myself making this suggestion on many threads, as an alternative
to surgery... don't rip your guitar apart, buy new pickups etc... put an
EQ pedal in your f/x loop. That way you keep the amp settings you prefer
for your other guitars, you set the pedal to bring the SG's tone into the range
you expect, and when you pick up the SG, stomp the pedal.

Problem solved, and for half the price of a new pickup or for half of
the loss of guitar value that you suffer when you change your Gibson's pots to
250 K. ...to me, 250k pots in an SG would sound muddy muddy muddy...

but I also believe that the tone controls you have on all your guitars offer
enough control for you to get everything you want. Somewhere on this very
forum there's a poll done by one of our members. He played the same riff
using a Les Paul and an SG, and challenged us all to say which was which.
He posted this over on MLP too. The results were clear. No one could reliably
say which was which. And on ETSG, we did better than they did on MLP. We
did a little better than 50%, they did something less than that.

To me that means that there's no reason your SG can't give you the darker
tones you want from it. It's just a matter of EQ in your signal chain.
The pedal gives you complete control over that, (at least in its 7 bands)
and has the advantage of a one stomp change and/or signal boost.
Very Useful IMHO. Good luck.

THE QUEST FOR TONE HAS NO FINISH LINE
SO IT'S TECHNICALLY A DEATH MARCH...
 

LeadFinger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2014
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
2,292
Location
Los Angeles
Covering the pickup (if not already) "darkens" it a bit, as does the far simpler method of playing with the pickup height. I've been playing with both, including some new covers I got for my LP, and there is a difference. Slight, but it's there. You know as a Tele neck pickup lover (I am too) that an old trick with teles is to remove the cover to brighten it up. Doing the opposite with an uncovered bucker can take some of the top end off.
 

flyswatter

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
312
Reaction score
210
Location
Montreal
Col,

Like your suggestion of the EQ pedal. I could use the amp tones as a "default" to match one guitar (SG or Tele) and use the pedal to lighen or darken as needed when I strap on the other. Easy way to switch tones during gigs.
 

eS.G.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
15,305
Reaction score
10,424
Location
The SWAMP (central Florida)
THE QUEST FOR TONE HAS NO FINISH LINE
SO IT'S TECHNICALLY A DEATH MARCH...

Truer words have yet to be spoken.......well by me anyway lol
 

flyswatter

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
312
Reaction score
210
Location
Montreal
For me hunting tone is an enjoyable hobby in between the hours of playing.

However:

A lot of my OCDness over tonality stems from the fact that I'm the guitarist/ lead singer in a band that plays everything from trad blues to hard rock to the occasional psychedelia and rockabilly -- plus I job occasionally with a number of other bands as a lead player.

As the guy who "carries the band," I don't have a lot of opportunity to switch guitars, twiddle amp knobs (which turns me away from the audience), mess with settings, etc. I need to do all these things as we switch styles, but too much of it slows down the show and gets awkward.

So, the more I can achieve versatility with one amp setting, a few flicks of the toggle, and a quick stomp on a pedal or two (all done blindly as I concentrate on singing), the better things go.
 

Col Mustard

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Messages
8,857
Reaction score
9,382
Location
Oscoda Michigan
yeah, I'm with you on that... on stage, it's best to keep things simple.
There's enough distractions and it's hard enough to keep the flow and all.
On my pedal boards, I have my starting points painted on with white
craft paint, so I can check the whole board at a glance. Different rooms
mean some changes but I know where I began, and it's a lot easier to
make quick correct decisions.

My SG starting points are not painted on, but I keep coming back to the
same setup: Neck volume at 7-8, Neck tone at 8, Bridge volume at 11,
bridge tone at 3.
 

flyswatter

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
312
Reaction score
210
Location
Montreal
Right, Colonel. It's a whole other playground when I'm home alone and can try out different experiments and sounds. But on stage it's all about the music and the flow of the performance, so I go with what's tried and tested and works.

Through a lot of trial and error, I've whittled my rig down to: 1 SG, 1 Tele, 1 Super Reverb, and a pedalboard consisting of a tuner, a Crybaby, two overdrives (low gain/ high gain), a chorus (rarely used except for a few phasing effects on the occasional song), and a delay/ reverb. Some gigs I bring along an acoustic as well.
 


Latest posts

Top