Moi aussi, Doc. I think they'd sell like hotcakes.I'll be curious to see if they post another one.
Moi aussi, Doc. I think they'd sell like hotcakes.I'll be curious to see if they post another one.
Yep. I'd like them better if the top laminate was closer in looks, to the bevel grain, so it's not that obvious.Moi aussi, Doc. I think they'd sell like hotcakes.
I completely agree, Doc. They shouldn't have veneers in my opinion unless it's a burst where the edges are dark and you can't see the transition, or they match the bevels. I'd rather have a plain Jane than a guitar where the top doesn't match something on the face of the guitar. My Wildkat has that sort of scarf joint too, and it looks decent.Yep. I'd like them better if the top laminate was closer in looks, to the bevel grain, so it's not that obvious.
I like where the scarf joint is at the base of the headstock, more of a natural transition than in the first ¼ of the neck.
Because a SG is a tool, a rock&roll tool, not a bling 6 string thing.I never understood why Epi Les Paul's had binding but the SG with a few exceptions went naked.
That's no Korean SG! That's an Unsong China like mine!Here's an original 2006 Korean Vintage, now on Reverb
https://reverb.com/item/6504328-epiphone-sg-400-2006-faded-cherry
Anyone who says cosmetics don't matter can go buy a square blank of wood with strings, if they really believe that.
I'm pretty sure we're all here because we fell in love with the SG's beautiful curves.
Even he went for bound body with gold hardwareI'd like that post twice over if I could...
I'm guessing Bo Diddley didn't care too much for curves and bevels, and took the advice you're giving:
![]()
![]()